Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: xlog_bufmgr
Date: 2000-11-30 01:43:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Would it be OK now to eliminate the separate xlog_bufmgr.c and
xlog_localbuf.c files, folding that code back into bufmgr.c and
localbuf.c?  It's a real pain to have to make parallel updates
in two copies of that code...

			regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2000-11-30 01:53:37
Subject: Re: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
Previous:From: Mikheev, VadimDate: 2000-11-30 01:39:35
Subject: Logging for sequences

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group