Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Some new list.c primitives

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Swan <thomas(dot)swan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>,Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some new list.c primitives
Date: 2005-07-28 18:42:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Swan <thomas(dot)swan(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 7/28/05, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> How about list_append_distinct and list_concat_distinct?

>> Those names are fine with me.

> list_append_unique and list_concat_unique might be a little clearer, unless
> you want to retain the sqlism of distinct.

I like those too --- sold, unless anyone objects?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-07-28 20:41:27
Subject: Re: Interesting COPY edge case...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-07-28 18:33:27
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic documentation for ROLEs.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group