Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: log rotatoin doc updates

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: log rotatoin doc updates
Date: 2004-09-17 23:08:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
"Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> My misunderstanding.  I misread the above to mean SIGHUP did not work, as 
> opposed to postgresql.conf variables for which SIGHUP *will* reload them.  
> I guess the word "only" refers to not being able to use SET?


I guess the wording assumes that you know that altering postgresql.conf
requires a SIGHUP to make anything happen.  I wouldn't object to
inserting some explicit mention of SIGHUP into these canned phrases,
if it can be done without making it much longer or more obscure.
Any thoughts?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-09-18 00:27:55
Subject: Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Previous:From: Ed L.Date: 2004-09-17 22:57:32
Subject: Re: log rotatoin doc updates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group