On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> However, that objection doesn't hold for plperl or pltcl (and likely
> not plpython, though I don't know that language enough to be sure).
> So it would be a reasonable feature request to teach those PLs to
> accept "record" parameters. I think the fact that they don't stems
> mostly from nobody having revisited their design since the
> infrastructure that supports record_out was created.
+1 # Would love to see that.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-26 01:07:36|
|Subject: Re: Range Types, discrete and/or continuous|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2010-10-26 00:57:54|
|Subject: Re: foreign keys for array/period contains relationships|