Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: tsearch2 wrapper

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Subject: Re: tsearch2 wrapper
Date: 2007-10-05 01:09:15
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> On Thursday 04 October 2007 11:52, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> a) simple C wrapper which can be SQL compatible .. with this wrapper
>> we don't need any changes in dump files .. but I thinking it's
>> impossible, because there are conflicts between functio'n names and
>> table's names.

> the new built in stuff should all be in pg_catalog schema, and the old stuff 
> in public schema, so in theory it would work... example of conflict?

The problem is the pg_catalog entries would capture any unqualified

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 2007-10-05 01:17:29
Subject: default_text_search_config
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2007-10-05 01:06:00
Subject: Re: tsearch2 wrapper

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group