| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Subject: | Re: tsearch2 wrapper |
| Date: | 2007-10-05 01:09:15 |
| Message-ID: | 25943.1191546555@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> On Thursday 04 October 2007 11:52, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> a) simple C wrapper which can be SQL compatible .. with this wrapper
>> we don't need any changes in dump files .. but I thinking it's
>> impossible, because there are conflicts between functio'n names and
>> table's names.
> the new built in stuff should all be in pg_catalog schema, and the old stuff
> in public schema, so in theory it would work... example of conflict?
The problem is the pg_catalog entries would capture any unqualified
names.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-10-05 01:17:29 | default_text_search_config |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-10-05 01:06:00 | Re: tsearch2 wrapper |