Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers-pitr(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch
Date: 2004-02-13 01:14:23
Message-ID: 25866.1076634863@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-pitr

Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com> writes:
> * The ability to force a WAL log switch to ensure all changes during the
> backup are flushed to archived logs and copied.

Why does that require a log switch? You can copy the active log file in
any case. (There was actually code to do that in J.R.'s patch, which I
disregarded because I see no point in it ...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-pitr by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cott Lang 2004-02-13 01:25:35 Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch
Previous Message Cott Lang 2004-02-13 00:48:20 Re: Review of last summer's PITR patch