| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: distinct vs group by |
| Date: | 2005-01-29 22:14:07 |
| Message-ID: | 25772.1107036847@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
> Should the expressions
> select distinct x from t
> and
> select x from t group by x
> have the same effect?
Offhand I think they are theoretically equivalent.
> It seems the optimizer sometimes chooses different plans for those
> expressions. Could the select distinct have used the slightly
> faster hash aggregate?
This is partly historical (the DISTINCT code hasn't been rewritten in a
long time) and partly intentional --- you can choose one phrasing or the
other to control what plan you get.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-29 22:16:48 | Re: Postgres database access problem |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Konnov | 2005-01-29 11:06:44 | History question. Please name all clones of PostGre |