Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: logical changeset generation v4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical changeset generation v4
Date: 2013-01-15 15:28:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2013-01-15 09:56:41 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Oh, hm.  Maybe the contrib module's make installcheck, then?

> Thats what I do right now, but I really would prefer to have it checked
> during normal make checks, installchecks aren't run all that commonly :(

Sure they are, in every buildfarm cycle.  I don't see the problem.

(In the case of contrib, make installcheck is a whole lot faster than
make check, as well as being older.  So I don't really see why you
think it's less used.)

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kohei KaiGaiDate: 2013-01-15 15:40:29
Subject: Re: ALTER command reworks
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-15 15:25:23
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group