Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Justin Clift <jclift(at)iprimus(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL
Date: 2001-03-14 16:32:01
Message-ID: 25642.984587521@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Instead we could run an empty test program before the real tests. If an
> empty program fails to run we can abort in good conscience.

That sounds like a plan. Do you want to do it, or shall I?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-14 16:56:44 Re: modulo operator bug?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-14 16:28:07 Re: Various bugs with PG7.1 8th March snapshot on Solaris 8 INTEL