Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Think I see a btree vacuuming bug
Date: 2002-08-27 13:06:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
>>> Could the index scan be made to
>>> handle cases where the index tuple it was stopped on is gone?

> Won't it still point to the same heap page and slot ?

Not if it's gone ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-08-27 13:08:23
Subject: Re: Default privileges for new databases (was Re: Can't
Previous:From: D'Arcy J.M. CainDate: 2002-08-27 11:31:31
Subject: Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group