From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, 'Hans-Jürgen Schönig' <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "'Pg Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Make pg_basebackup configure and start standby [Review] |
Date: | 2012-10-04 14:43:15 |
Message-ID: | 25302.1349361795@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
>> Did you think about something like the attached code?
> Or rather this one, which fixes a bug so fillPGconn() and PQconninfo() are
> symmetric and work for "requiressl".
That's incredibly ugly. I'm not sure where we should keep the "R"
information, but shoehorning it into the existing PQconninfoOption
struct like that seems totally unacceptable. Either we're willing to
break backwards compatibility on the Disp-Char strings, or we need
to put that info somewhere else.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-10-04 15:09:49 | Sharing more infrastructure between walsenders and regular backends (was Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication) |
Previous Message | Amit kapila | 2012-10-04 14:33:53 | Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |