| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | viod <viod(dot)len(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GSoC project : K-medoids clustering in Madlib |
| Date: | 2013-03-27 05:27:07 |
| Message-ID: | 253.1364362027@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I suggested a couple of algorithms to be implemented in MADLib(apart
> from K Medoids). You could pick some(or all) of them, which would
> require 3 months to be completed.
> As for more information on index, you can refer
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/What's_new_in_PostgreSQL_9.1
> along with the postgres wiki. The wiki is the standard for anything postgres.
> pg_trgm used KNN, but I believe it uses its own implementation of the
> algorithm. The idea I proposed aims at writing an implementation in
> the MADlib so that any client program can use the algorithm(s) in
> their code directly, using MADlib functions.
I'm a bit confused as to why this is being proposed as a
Postgres-related project. I don't even know what MADlib is, but I'm
pretty darn sure that no part of Postgres uses it. KNNGist certainly
doesn't.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Farina | 2013-03-27 05:50:49 | Re: GSoC project : K-medoids clustering in Madlib |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-03-27 05:06:33 | Re: sql_drop Event Triggerg |