Re: parallel restore

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore
Date: 2009-01-04 17:14:38
Message-ID: 25267.1231089278@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I propose to commit this unless someone wants more time for reviewing.

A moment's eyeballing of the patch finds rather a lot of debugging cruft
yet (inserted printfs, "#ifdef WIN32blah", etc); also I think the
addition to include/port.h belongs in port/win32.h instead.

More generally, though, I think it hasn't been looked at much by
anyone (certainly not by me).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-01-04 17:28:22 Re: parallel restore
Previous Message Greg Stark 2009-01-04 16:40:21 Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch: unexpected error querying standby