Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 11:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've concluded that that's too large a change to undertake for 9.0
> The purpose of this was to make the big changes in 9.0. If we aren't
> going to do that it seems like we shouldn't bother at all.
No, the purpose of this was to get rid of VACUUM FULL INPLACE in 9.0.
I'm not interested in destabilizing the code (even more) just to avoid
one small internal kluge. The proposed magic field in struct Relation
is the only part of this that I'd foresee reverting later.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Sabino Mullane||Date: 2010-02-03 17:34:43|
|Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings|
|Previous:||From: David E. Wheeler||Date: 2010-02-03 17:27:27|
|Subject: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]|