Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] GPL code issue?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,"Andreas Pflug" <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>,pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GPL code issue?
Date: 2003-10-01 03:39:15
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackerspgsql-hackers
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> In src/backend/parser/parse.h there is a copyright that reads as below.
> Note the bottom section that says that the GPL is only excepted for
> files generated by Bison *from* this file. This implies to me that this
> file is GPL'd,

No.  The text in question is copied verbatim from some Bison component
file that supplies a lot of fixed boilerplate for Bison output files.
It's not very well phrased, perhaps, but their intent is clearly to
exempt Bison output files from the GPL, and this *is* a Bison output

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2003-10-01 04:06:38
Subject: Re: Wednesday beta postponed till Thursday
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-01 03:11:24
Subject: Wednesday beta postponed till Thursday

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Stefan CsomorDate: 2003-10-01 07:07:56
Subject: Re: Mac Port
Previous:From: Adam H.PendletonDate: 2003-09-30 22:43:38
Subject: Mac Port

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group