Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Date: 2003-02-24 19:35:34
Message-ID: 251960000.1046115334@lerlaptop.iadfw.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

--On Monday, February 24, 2003 11:11:34 -0800 Joe Conway
<mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:

> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Further, Joe Conway gave me a guesstimate of 6k per max_fsm_pages which
>> seems rather high ... in fact, the default settings for this value
>> (10000) would swamp the memory used by the rest of Postgres.
>
> I don't recall (and cannot find in my sent mail) ever making that
> guesstimate. Can you provide some context?
It may be 6 **BYTES** per max_fsm_pages.

>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-02-24 19:55:45 Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-02-24 19:34:00 Re: Memory taken by FSM_relations