Re: using explicit_bzero

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: using explicit_bzero
Date: 2019-07-17 22:45:39
Message-ID: 25152.1563403539@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-Jul-11, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Following a trail of crumbs beginning at OpenSSH's fallback
>> implementation of this[1], I learned that C11 has standardised
>> memset_s[2] for this purpose. Macs have memset_s but no
>> explicit_bzero. FreeBSD has both. I wonder if it'd be better to make
>> memset_s the function we use in our code, considering its standard
>> blessing and therefore likelihood of being available on every system
>> eventually.

> Sounds like a future-proof way would be to implement memset_s in
> src/port if absent from the OS (using explicit_bzero and other tricks),
> and use that.

+1 for using the C11-standard name, even if that's not anywhere
in the real world yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-07-17 22:48:07 Re: getting ERROR "relation 16401 has no triggers" with partition foreign key alter
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-07-17 22:42:07 New "-b slim" option in 2019b zic: should we turn that on?