Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Date: 2008-03-20 21:52:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Chris Hoover wrote:
>> If you have any real life good or bad stories, I'd love to hear it.  Given
>> the NetApp arrays supposedly being very good NFS platforms, overall, is this
>> a recommended way to run PostgreSQL, or is it recommended to not run this
>> way.

> We do have an NFS section in our documentation at the bottom of this
> page:

Aside from what's said there, I'd note that it's a seriously bad idea
to use a "soft mount" or any arrangement wherein it's possible for
Postgres to be running while the NFS disk is not mounted.  Joe Conway
can still show you the scars from learning that lesson, I believe.
See the archives...

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-21 03:30:01
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Previous:From: Frits HooglandDate: 2008-03-20 21:23:30
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group