Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: timestamp indexing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp indexing
Date: 2005-05-30 17:57:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com> writes:
>> What version of PostgreSQL are you using?

> Also answered in my follow-up - "not yet pg8" :)

Your followup hasn't shown up here yet, but if the query is written like
	WHERE timestampcol >= now() - interval 'something'
then the pre-8.0 planner is not capable of making a good estimate of the
selectivity of the WHERE clause.  One solution is to fold the timestamp
computation to a constant on the client side.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bricklen AndersonDate: 2005-05-30 22:00:37
Subject: Re: poor performance involving a small table
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-05-30 17:15:08
Subject: Re: Postgresql and xeon.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group