| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Mammoth in Core? |
| Date: | 2010-01-16 00:40:08 |
| Message-ID: | 24673.1263602408@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> O.k. I know there is no way we will hit this for 8.5. So this is more of
> a future discussion more than anything.
Well, this is not really the time to be having such a discussion; right
now we need to all have our noses to the grindstone dealing with the
already-submitted 8.5 features. The start of the next devel cycle would
be a more appropriate time to think about it.
(Personally, I suspect we're going to have our hands full dealing with
HS+SR for quite some time to come, which implies we should not scatter
our energies across multiple replication solutions. But that will be
clearer in a few months when we see what emerges from beta.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-01-16 03:22:02 | Re: Streaming replication, loose ends |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-01-16 00:26:58 | Re: bug in integration SQL parser to plpgsq |