Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re : Re : Dependence between jobs

From: houssem jemel <houssem20(at)yahoo(dot)fr>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re : Re : Dependence between jobs
Date: 2009-01-08 14:56:07
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-support
Why can we not use the parameter of the step "succed" "failed" in the pgadmin in order to inject it to another step or another job

----- Message d'origine ----
De : Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
À : houssem jemel <houssem20(at)yahoo(dot)fr>
Cc : pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 8 Janvier 2009, 14h58mn 51s
Objet : Re: Re : [pgadmin-support] Dependence between jobs

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:50 PM, houssem jemel <houssem20(at)yahoo(dot)fr> wrote:
> In that case we can not create e rule between two scripts on 2 different machines, since the job is assignet to one machine
> Is there a solution to that ?

No. You could potentially use some creative scripting and scp/ssh to
have one machine write the success or failure of a job to a location
that the other can inspect.

Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:


In response to


pgadmin-support by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-01-08 15:00:49
Subject: Re: Re : Re : Dependence between jobs
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-01-08 13:58:51
Subject: Re: Re : Dependence between jobs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group