Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type
Date: 2004-06-07 05:33:43
Message-ID: 24631.1086586423@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Yep, that's fine. I believe someone said that we'd never removed one
> before, but now we should be careful not to reuse the SET type OID?

Uh, why worry? If you had an application that depended in any way
shape or form on the SET type, then I already broke it ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-06-07 05:48:53 Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-06-07 05:23:33 Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type