Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> ... Remove the ancient SET entry
>> in pg_type, which is now highly unlikely to ever become used again.
> Hehe - speaking of how we never remove types :)
Hm? I think the recent discussion was about contracting not to
arbitrarily reassign OIDs for existing types. Nobody said anything
about not being able to remove types, especially not ones as dead as
this doornail was.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2004-06-07 05:23:33|
|Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-06-07 04:52:10|
|Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Some preliminary documentation for composite-type stuff. |