Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type
Date: 2004-06-07 05:20:03
Message-ID: 24532.1086585603@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> ... Remove the ancient SET entry
>> in pg_type, which is now highly unlikely to ever become used again.

> Hehe - speaking of how we never remove types :)

Hm? I think the recent discussion was about contracting not to
arbitrarily reassign OIDs for existing types. Nobody said anything
about not being able to remove types, especially not ones as dead as
this doornail was.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-06-07 05:23:33 Re: pgsql-server: Minor catalog cleanups for composite-type
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-06-07 04:52:10 Re: pgsql-server: Some preliminary documentation for composite-type stuff.