Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 12:01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In particular, I don't understand why there's not a
>> standard float8range type; that seems like a pretty common case.
>> I'd have also expected to see a standard textrange type. What was
>> the rationale for leaving these out?
> A built-in textrange type would have to have collation "C", right? Do
> you think that would be useful to enough people?
No, its collation could be set to "default", which would match the
database's LC_COLLATE setting. Probably the more interesting
implementation problem is to come up with a subtype_diff function ...
> One that I'd like to see is an IP address type, but that's complicated
> because inet and cidr support netmasks.
Yeah, it's not clear what if anything to do with the netmask.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2011-11-30 18:21:54|
|Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2011-11-30 18:20:18|
|Subject: Re: Word-smithing doc changes|