Re: new version of contrib-intarray

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: new version of contrib-intarray
Date: 2001-01-29 14:48:21
Message-ID: 24301.980779701@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> gist__int_ops | 1007
> gist__intbig_ops | 1007

> we want gist__int_ops to be default index opclass.
> If we delete gist__intbig_ops entry from opclass, then we couldn't use
> gist__intbig_ops !

Put in gist__intbig_ops with zero for the default type. You should
never have more than one entry in pg_opclass claiming to be the default
for a given type OID.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-01-29 15:03:40 Re: scan.l simplifications
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-01-29 14:43:35 Re: Ungraceful handling of fatal flex errors