"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
> I don't know much about what is involved in crafting these solutions,
> but it seems we're close to beta and probably don't want to make drastic
> changes to anything. As such it seems to me that solving the problem
> for analyze is a nice piece of low-hanging fruit that solves an
> immediate problem that has been reported.
It's not as low-hanging as all that. I'm not sure if you realized it,
but there was a whole lot of handwaving going in the earlier posts...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-10-01 23:35:36|
|Subject: Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-10-01 23:25:16|
|Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |