| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |
| Date: | 2003-03-20 16:55:09 |
| Message-ID: | 24128.1048179309@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
>> Do you think we should replace them all with a utility called pg_maintain
>> that can do all of them?
> If you ask me, we could get rid of them completely because
> for d in $(psql -l --somthing); do vacuum $d; done
> seems perfectly fine.
If you have a real shell (and know how to use it), sure. Is such a
solution acceptable to all those Windows users we're hoping to attract?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-20 16:58:25 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-20 16:22:01 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-20 16:58:25 | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/manage-ag.sgml oc/sr ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-20 16:48:33 | Re: Faster NUMERIC implementation |