Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rewrite GEQO's gimme_tree function so that it always finds a

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rewrite GEQO's gimme_tree function so that it always finds a
Date: 2009-11-28 01:32:32
Message-ID: 2407.1259371952@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This is pretty off-topic, but if we had some upper bound on the cost
> of the complete plan, we could discard pieces of the plan that already
> cost more.

> One way to get the upper bound is to generate the plan in depth-first
> fashion, instead of the current breadth-first. Instead of bottom-up
> dynamic programming, employ memoization.

Well, the breadth-first approach also allows elimination of large parts
of the search space. It's not immediately obvious to me that the above
would be better. You should be able to try it if you want though ---
these days, there's even a hook to allow replacement of the join search
strategy at runtime.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-11-28 15:04:55 pgsql: test_fsync: Improve test descriptions displayed during
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-28 01:23:08 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rewrite GEQO's gimme_tree function so that it always finds a

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-11-28 03:18:20 Re: operator exclusion constraints
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-11-28 01:28:13 Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION