| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Hou, Zhijie" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32 |
| Date: | 2021-01-19 10:05:45 |
| Message-ID: | 23ce30da-193e-8dbc-c129-14533e45782b@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-01-14 09:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I don't have more comments by reading the code and my tests have
> passed after applying the patch on top of df10ac62. I would have also
> added some tests that check after blkno < 0 and > MaxBlockNumber in
> all the functions where it can be triggered as that's cheap for 1.8
> and 1.9, but that it's a minor point.
committed with some additional tests
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-01-19 10:28:42 | Re: configurable the threshold for warning due to run out of transaction ID |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-01-19 09:53:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |