Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

The may/can/might business

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: The may/can/might business
Date: 2007-02-01 20:19:34
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
<                    errmsg("aggregate function calls cannot be nested")));
>                    errmsg("aggregate function calls may not be nested")));

I don't think that this is an improvement, or even correct English.

You have changed a message that states that an action is logically
impossible into one that implies we are arbitrarily refusing to let
the user do something that *could* be done, if only we'd let him.

There is relevant material in the message style guidelines, section
45.3.8: it says that "cannot open file "%s" ... indicates that the
functionality of opening the named file does not exist at all in the
program, or that it's conceptually impossible."

			regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-01 20:43:04
Subject: Re: The may/can/might business
Previous:From: Doug KnightDate: 2007-02-01 20:14:48
Subject: Re: pg_standby

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group