Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [DOCS] Remove name as valid parameter for catalog functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Remove name as valid parameter for catalog functions
Date: 2011-03-07 15:19:00
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgadmin-hackerspgsql-docs
Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
> Patch attached which corrects the docs where catalog functions no
> longer accept values of type name.  Originally a note submitted by
> someone on the docs, but this affects more than just the one they
> mentioned.

The reason those are phrased as "OID or name" is that what they take is
regclass, which means that things like pg_total_relation_size('table_name')
do in fact work.  I think the proposed wording would leave people with
the idea that they had to supply a numeric OID, which is a PITA and not
by any means the expected usage.  I agree that maybe the original
wording could use some improvement, but I don't think that just removing
"or name" is an improvement.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-03-07 17:01:19
Subject: Re: Sync rep doc corrections
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2011-03-07 13:57:09
Subject: Remove name as valid parameter for catalog functions

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-03-07 17:18:17
Subject: Re: s/xpm/png/g
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-03-07 14:55:03
Subject: Re: s/xpm/png/g

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group