Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)
Date: 2002-05-13 04:31:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Were your revisions extensive? Any major misconceptions on my part?

I did a fair amount of polishing on the ExprContext callback stuff,
and removed or moved around some node fields that I thought were
unnecessary or in the wrong place.  I also set up proper infrastructure
for cost estimation on function RTEs (though the estimates themselves
are still pretty lame).  Nothing I'd call "major"... more in the
line of stylistic improvements...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rajesh Kumar Mallah.Date: 2002-05-13 04:50:07
Subject: Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ?
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2002-05-13 04:24:22
Subject: Re: TRUNCATE

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-05-13 17:47:06
Subject: Re: comment on operator / schema
Previous:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2002-05-13 04:08:35
Subject: Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group