| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) |
| Date: | 2002-05-13 04:31:33 |
| Message-ID: | 23924.1021264293@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Were your revisions extensive? Any major misconceptions on my part?
I did a fair amount of polishing on the ExprContext callback stuff,
and removed or moved around some node fields that I thought were
unnecessary or in the wrong place. I also set up proper infrastructure
for cost estimation on function RTEs (though the estimates themselves
are still pretty lame). Nothing I'd call "major"... more in the
line of stylistic improvements...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah. | 2002-05-13 04:50:07 | Re: Further info : Very high load average but no cpu utilization ? |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-05-13 04:24:22 | Re: TRUNCATE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-13 17:47:06 | Re: comment on operator / schema |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-05-13 04:08:35 | Re: SRF patch (was Re: [HACKERS] troubleshooting pointers) |