Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Date: 1998-05-23 19:33:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Well, the upshot from here is that having done "cvs checkout pgsql"
once, I can do either
	cvs update			-- within pgsql
	cvs -d blahblah checkout pgsql	-- in parent directory
and they both seem to work and do the same thing (although with no
updates committed in the last two hours, it's hard to be sure).

If I omit the -d option to the cvs checkout, it fails; it does not
know enough to fetch the repository address from pgsql/CVS/Root.
But cvs update is cool.

Dunno why it doesn't work for Marc.  I'm running cvs 1.9; you?

			regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 1998-05-23 19:38:23
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-05-23 19:18:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group