Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Index corruption

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index corruption
Date: 2006-06-29 16:11:08
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com> writes:
> On Tom Lane's advice, we upgraded to Postgres 8.0.8.

OK, so it's not an already-known problem.

> We were able to corrupt the index within 90 minutes of starting up our
> cluster.  A slony-induced vacuum was under way on the provider at the
> time the subscriber failed.

You still haven't given any details.  What do you mean by "corrupt the
index" --- what actual symptoms are you seeing?

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-29 16:12:53
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
Previous:From: Marc MunroDate: 2006-06-29 15:58:48
Subject: Re: Index corruption

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group