Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: skip FK trigger on UPDATE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: skip FK trigger on UPDATE
Date: 2005-05-30 01:06:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What's the point of removing the distinction between check_ins and
>> check_upd functions?

> I talked about this in an earlier message to -hackers: check_upd was 
> actually unused (check_ins was used for both inserts and updates).

Hm, guess I missed (or forgot) that message.

> Hmm, I suppose -- if you prefer I can have check_ins called by the 
> INSERT trigger and check_upd called by the UPDATE trigger, which 
> probably makes more sense.

Yeah ... I thought it was doing that already.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2005-05-30 01:59:59
Subject: Re: O_DIRECT for WAL writes
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-05-30 00:16:15
Subject: Re: skip FK trigger on UPDATE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group