Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date?
Date: 2006-05-30 14:08:03
Message-ID: 23487.1148998083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I don't currently have an FC5 box to test with. Here's what to try: move
> the ppport.h aside, and in the plperl directory run this command to
> generate a replacement:

> perl -MDevel::PPPort -e 'Devel::PPPort::WriteFile();'

> and then recompile.

Hm. It compiles without warnings, but the new ppport.h is about 100K
larger than the old one :-(. The change we seem to actually need is
just to put "#ifndef PERL_UNUSED_DECL" around the attempted declaration
of that macro, so I'm inclined to just commit that rather than buy into
everything else that seems to have been done to PPPort lately.
Thoughts?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-30 14:13:00 Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-30 14:01:49 Re: [PATCH] Improve EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead by sampling