Re: inline is not ANSI C

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Luis Amigo <lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inline is not ANSI C
Date: 2002-01-30 15:43:15
Message-ID: 23485.1012405395@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Luis Amigo <lamigo(at)atc(dot)unican(dot)es> writes:
>> configure arranges to #define inline as empty if your compiler doesn't
>> take it. Is that not working as expected in your case?

> No it is not working as expected, I'd to remove them at my own.

Would you look at configure's test for this and find out why it fails
to detect that inline doesn't work? As the only one with access to
the problem compiler, you cannot expect anyone else to fix this;
it's your responsibility to improve the configure test so it gets the
right answer on your platform.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-30 15:46:25 Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-01-30 15:41:10 Re: Per-database and per-user GUC settings