| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: additional error fields |
| Date: | 2012-05-01 23:22:15 |
| Message-ID: | 23462.1335914535@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> There is another advantage to doing this within the core system that I
> have not touched upon, which is that in this way we can expose another
> useful GUC to reduce log noise, beyond log_min_messages.
Yeah, that one is actually a pretty compelling argument. A *lot* of
people would like to have a setting for "log only non-routine errors",
I think.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-05-02 00:05:07 | Re: proposal: additional error fields |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-01 23:11:02 | Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? |