Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On fre, 2012-04-27 at 14:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think there is no point at all in having a discussion about this
>> unless we can first agree that the overwhelming majority of people who
>> have commented on this issue on this list are unhappy with the current
>> default behavior. If we are not going to change the default behavior,
>> then there is zero point in talking about this.
> Have you reviewed the previous discussions where changing the default
> behavior was discussed and rejected? I don't like the current default
> any more than you do, but without any new arguments, there is, as you
> say, zero point in talking about this.
Perhaps I've forgotten something, but I only recall debates about
switching the default to a different one of the existing shutdown modes.
The new material here is the proposal for a new mode.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2012-04-29 16:04:01|
|Subject: Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-04-29 15:06:58|
|Subject: Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) |