Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules
Date: 2006-06-02 02:27:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chris(dot)kings-lynne(at)calorieking(dot)com> writes:
> My request for phpPgAdmin is to somehow be able to check if the .so file 
> for a module is present.

> For instance, I'd like to 'enable slony support' if the slony shared 
> library is present.  PPA's slony support automatically executes the .sql 
> files, so all I need to know is if the .so is there.

I really think this is backwards: you should be looking for the .sql
files.  Every module will have a .sql file, not every one will need a
.so file.  See followup thread in -hackers where we're trying to hash
out design details.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-06-02 02:31:01
Subject: Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?
Previous:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2006-06-02 01:41:11
Subject: Re: More thoughts about planner's cost estimates

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2006-06-02 02:39:20
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2006-06-02 01:38:54
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Magic block for modules

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group