Steven Lembark <lembark(at)wrkhors(dot)com> writes:
>>> Are we in the business of excluding text-based browsers? Or obsolete
>>> ones, for that matter?
> I don't think we would want to be in the business of
> dealing successfully with every quirk of every browser
> ever released.
That's nothing but a straw-man. The point here was to avoid using
constructs that we know won't work on some set of browsers, not to
specifically code around any "quirks". I already suggested a workable
solution that involves no new assumptions at all, which was to put the
added info on the linked-to pages instead of directly on the dashboard.
Now we could do that *and* use tooltips, if we can be fairly sure that
the tooltips will be ignored by browsers that can't handle them as
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Fausak||Date: 2008-08-24 16:19:24|
|Subject: xml plans for postgres?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-08-24 16:00:01|
|Subject: Re: proposal sql: labeled function params |