Re: Max Number of Databases on a Server.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: daleedom(at)hightowergroup(dot)com (David A(dot) Leedom)
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Max Number of Databases on a Server.
Date: 2002-04-15 15:19:44
Message-ID: 23245.1018883984@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

daleedom(at)hightowergroup(dot)com (David A. Leedom) writes:
> If I created 100 separate databases on a Linux Server would this be a
> problem? Or is the issue more related to concurrent connections?

If you're talking about multiple databases served by a single
postmaster, I don't believe it's much of an issue. You might start to
notice performance problems when you got past a few thousands, but
that'd have more to do with kernel performance (slow lookup for many
files in one directory) than Postgres itself.

Concurrent connections is a much more interesting question, but no one
can give you any interesting answers without a lot more assumptions
than "typical Linux server". How much iron is that really, and what
are your concurrent users going to be doing?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Tkach 2002-04-15 17:07:20 Alter/update large tables - VERRRY annoying behaviour!
Previous Message Auri Mason 2002-04-15 13:48:28 Re: upgrade