Re: AIX binaries

From: dev(at)volpe(dot)it
To: "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AIX binaries
Date: 2005-06-08 20:54:30
Message-ID: 2310292B-7911-430C-AAFE-A8B69BE2A7D5@volpe.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

./configure CC=/usr/vac/bin/cc --enable-aix64 --with-includes=/opt/
freeware/include --with-libraries=/opt/freeware/lib --with-python --
with-pam --enable-thread-safety

Optimizing flags do NOT works

No other flags set.

C&T
V

On Jun 8, 2005, at 10:04 PM, Mohan, Ross wrote:

> right..i remember now...what were your
>
> CFLAGS set to?
>
> and which ./configure flags did you use?
>
>
>
> I had to get pretty damn vanilla to get the code to like me.
>
>
> Ciao e Grazie, per adesso,
>
> Ross
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev(at)volpe(dot)it [mailto:dev(at)volpe(dot)it]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 3:57 PM
> To: Mohan, Ross
> Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] AIX binaries
>
> The "RUN" problem is:
>
> could not connect to database template1: FATAL: unsupported
> frontend protocol 0.0: server supports 1.0 to 3.0
>
>
> Means I built positively on 5.3 but NEVER run !
>
> C&T (Ciao & Thanks, from now on)
>
> Vince
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Mohan, Ross wrote:
>
>> Vince,
>>
>> I don't think it's stable enough, but as of now, that's a
>> prejudice based
>> on my difficulty in getting the code to compile and run under
>> anything but
>> the lowest level of optimization.
>>
>> I wouldn't feel comfortable sharing binaries until I've tested it
>> a bit more.
>> ( For now, just initdb, createdb, test and start/shut has been
>> done. )
>>
>> My Machine? 7029 p570 power5 AIX5.3
>>
>> Remind me of the "run" problem?
>>
>> Next step: I am going to be running these non-optimized binaries
>> in debug mode and try to flush out critters.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Ross
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pgsql-ports-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-ports-
>> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of dev(at)volpe(dot)it
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 3:21 PM
>> To: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Subject: Re: [PORTS] AIX binaries
>>
>> Why not trying to organize it?!
>>
>> We may arrange a "uniform" build (compile options, etc) to test on
>> different HW environment and eventually release (by one of us) a
>> "stable" lpp.
>>
>> I can build on:
>>
>> 140 AIX 5.1
>> P630 AIX 5.2
>> P595 AIX 5.3
>>
>> What about you guys?
>>
>> BUT! If I'm not wrong we still have the 5.3 run problem... the one
>> Andrew Hammond open an APAR with IBM (not yet an ID?)?
>>
>> Ciao
>>
>> Vince
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2005, at 4:41 PM, Mohan, Ross wrote:
>>
>>> well.....<smiling>...i have some, yes.
>>>
>>> Don't think they are quite "installp"-ready, however.
>>>
>>> :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: pgsql-ports-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-ports-
>>> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Mag Gam
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 8:49 AM
>>> To: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>> Subject: [PORTS] AIX binaries
>>>
>>>
>>> Are there any postgres AIX binaries?
>>> installp would be nicer then rpm IMO
>>>
>>> ---------------------------(end of
>>> broadcast)---------------------------
>>> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>>>
>>> ---------------------------(end of
>>> broadcast)---------------------------
>>> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
>>> majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mohan, Ross 2005-06-08 21:00:59 Re: AIX binaries
Previous Message Mohan, Ross 2005-06-08 20:04:17 Re: AIX binaries