| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: psqlODBC 08.02.0300 doesn't compile |
| Date: | 2007-04-25 15:41:40 |
| Message-ID: | 23093.1177515700@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This makes life difficult for packagers who need to re-run aclocal
>> (in my case, because Red Hat ships a different automake version than
>> you guys are using). I believe it's also a violation of the LGPL.
> Hmm, thats how Peter designed it for us so we didn't have to have our
> own copies of all the PG macros iirc. I don't have enough autoconf foo
> to know how best to fix it though. Peter?
Hm, so you're pulling those macros directly from the underlying Postgres
installation? I didn't think they got installed anywhere --- I could do
the same if they are, but not if running aclocal requires access to a
Postgres source tree.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-25 15:47:07 | Re: psqlODBC 08.02.0300 doesn't compile |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-25 15:29:05 | Re: psqlODBC 08.02.0300 doesn't compile |