Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] Missing error message on missing ssl-key-files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Missing error message on missing ssl-key-files
Date: 2007-01-30 15:32:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> So I still tthink it's a good idea. Even though it doesn't solve every
> case, it solves a lot of them I think. And more importantly on that, I
> don't see how it would *break* anything (given that it still fires only
> when running as a service, when everything on stderr is just thrown away
> anyway). Do you see suhc a failure case?

The case I'm worried about is subprocess startup, where we haven't yet
been able to re-set any of these variables correctly.  And yes, I think
it's an issue: if a DBA is expecting to find PG error messages in the
syslogger files, he's unlikely to go look in the eventlog.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-01-30 15:33:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Searching some sites explaing about PosgtreSQL
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-01-30 15:17:20
Subject: Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work)

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-01-30 15:39:03
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Missing error message on missing ssl-key-files
Previous:From: Sergiy VyshnevetskiyDate: 2007-01-30 15:29:25
Subject: Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group