Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers-oo(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers-oo(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] TABLEOID patch
Date: 2000-07-01 17:55:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is the tableoid patch. If there are no objections can I have
> this applied?

I definitely object to the tests of tableoid that you have attached to
the inherit regress test.  Don't you realize that anything that depends
on another installation matching the exact same OIDs you have is pretty
much guaranteed to fail?

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-07-01 18:12:10
Subject: Re: Bug in new memory system?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-07-01 17:37:21
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-07-01 20:49:46
Subject: Re: to_date/char (fwd)
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-07-01 15:04:11
Subject: Re: to_date/char (fwd)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group