Re: New gist vacuum.

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New gist vacuum.
Date: 2018-03-02 17:00:41
Message-ID: 22886B66-5391-460E-992C-C710DCFE136E@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 2 марта 2018 г., в 21:25, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> написал(а):
>
> Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> writes:
>> So, I agree, unconditional counting is a good idea. Here's the v3 patch.
>
> Pushed with trivial cosmetic adjustments.
>
> I've marked the CF entry as committed; please make a new CF entry in
> 2018-09 for the other patch. I'd also suggest starting a new email
> thread for that. Linking the CF entry to a years-old thread doesn't
> make it easy for people to find what's the current submission.

Thanks, Tom!

Yes, I'll definitely start new thread for that patch. This thread had split unexpectedly, and I see it's not a convenient way. I've learned no to do it this way anymore :)

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julian Markwort 2018-03-02 17:07:32 Re: [HACKERS] [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02)
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-03-02 16:59:36 Re: Rewrite of pg_dump TAP tests