|From:||Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>|
|To:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Cc:||Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: New gist vacuum.|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
> 2 марта 2018 г., в 21:25, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> написал(а):
> Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> writes:
>> So, I agree, unconditional counting is a good idea. Here's the v3 patch.
> Pushed with trivial cosmetic adjustments.
> I've marked the CF entry as committed; please make a new CF entry in
> 2018-09 for the other patch. I'd also suggest starting a new email
> thread for that. Linking the CF entry to a years-old thread doesn't
> make it easy for people to find what's the current submission.
Yes, I'll definitely start new thread for that patch. This thread had split unexpectedly, and I see it's not a convenient way. I've learned no to do it this way anymore :)
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
|Next Message||Julian Markwort||2018-03-02 17:07:32||Re: [HACKERS] [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans (v02)|
|Previous Message||Stephen Frost||2018-03-02 16:59:36||Re: Rewrite of pg_dump TAP tests|