David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 at 11:11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> ... We could keep it in that same "tablectx"
> I don't think you could do that and have your patch as SH_GROW() needs
> to pfree the old bucket array after rehashing, which bump won't like.
Ah, good point. Nevermind that idea then ...
regards, tom lane