Backward compatibility patch for numutils.c

From: "Markus Wollny" <Markus(dot)Wollny(at)computec(dot)de>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Backward compatibility patch for numutils.c
Date: 2004-06-30 18:05:17
Message-ID: 2266D0630E43BB4290742247C891057502B9D5DA@dozer.computec.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi!

We're using some "hardwired" apps which try to insert '' in INT-fields when what they really mean is NULL. 7.2 wasn't bothered by this behaviour, but 7.3 was and it broke some apps then. So Bruce had posted a patch for 7.3's /src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c - I couldn't find the original posting when someone asked some time ago and I cannot find it now, however I have reposted his patch there: http://groups.google.de/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=2266D0630E43BB4290742247C89105750393D53E%40dozer.computec.de

Now the relevant bit has slightly changed in 7.4.x and I wonder what else would be affected when applying the same thing here; I have made the same changes to the source of 7.4.3, resulting in the following diff:

diff numutils.c.patched numutils.c.orig
69,74c69,74
< else if (*s == 0)
< {
< /* 7.4.X workaround for broken apps */
< elog(WARNING, "pg_atoi: zero-length string");
< l = (long) 0;
< }
---
> if (*s == 0)
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
> errmsg("invalid input syntax for integer: \"%s\"",
> s)));
>

It compiles fine, but I don't know if I'd shoot myself in the foot when actually using and trusting the thus patched 7.4.3 in a production environment. Any thoughts? Or can I put my mind at rest regardless? I know it's breaking the SQL-specs, but I'd rather have that than broken apps...

Kind regards

Markus Wollny

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2004-06-30 18:09:32 psql - list objects in a schema
Previous Message Dennis Gearon 2004-06-30 17:05:30 Re: backups