Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Date: 1999-10-26 14:01:59
Message-ID: 22606.940946519@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Sounds good. My only question is whether people need backward
> compatibility, and whether we can remove the compatiblity part of the
> interface and small overhead after 7.1 or later?

I think we could drop it after a decent interval, but I don't see any
reason to be in a hurry. I do think that we'll get complaints if 7.0
doesn't have any backward compatibility for existing user functions.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message saad 1999-10-26 14:17:37 what the hell telnet is
Previous Message Fernando Schapachnik 1999-10-26 12:47:11 Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1